Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil ; 14(1): 208, 2022 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162413

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 season Chinese Super League (CSL) was held in neutral venues, this study aims to analyse the impact of removing home advantage (HA) in CSL. METHOD: 240 games of the CSL 2019 season (home and away double round-robin system) and 160 games of the 2020 season (in neutral venues) were analysed. 27 technical and tactical performance indicators were involved as dependent variables. A multiple linear regression model was established to analyse the influence of removing HA on the performance indicators. RESULTS: After moving from home stadium to neutral venue in 2020 season, goal, shot, shot on target, shot from outside box, shot from inside box, shot on target from inside box, corner kick, key pass, cross, breakthrough, tackle decreased significantly (p < 0.05), while yellow card and foul increased steeply (p < 0.05). Comparing with playing away match, in neutral venue, free kicks and pass accuracy enhanced radically (p < 0.05), while tackle, clearance and block shot dropped noticeably (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When removing HA and playing in the neutral venue, teams' performance dropped significantly. This study confirmed the positive impact of HA on the teams' performance and may help elite football teams make proper playing strategies regarding different match locations.

3.
Artif Intell Rev ; 54(6): 4653-4684, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1202775

RESUMEN

In an overwhelming demand scenario, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, pressure over health systems may outburst their predicted capacity to deal with such extreme situations. Therefore, in order to successfully face a health emergency, scientific evidence and validated models are needed to provide real-time information that could be applied by any health center, especially for high-risk populations, such as transplant recipients. We have developed a hybrid prediction model whose accuracy relative to several alternative configurations has been validated through a battery of clustering techniques. Using hospital admission data from a cohort of hospitalized transplant patients, our hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model extrapolates the progression towards severe COVID-19 disease with an accuracy of 96.3%, outperforming any competing model, such as logistic regression (65.5%) and random forest (44.8%). In this regard, DEA-ANN allows us to categorize the evolution of patients through the values of the analyses performed at hospital admission. Our prediction model may help guiding COVID-19 management through the identification of key predictors that permit a sustainable management of resources in a patient-centered model. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-021-10008-0.

4.
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr ; 1863(6): 183590, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1188312

RESUMEN

The envelope protein E of the SARS-CoV coronavirus is an archetype of viroporin. It is a small hydrophobic protein displaying ion channel activity that has proven highly relevant in virus-host interaction and virulence. Ion transport through E channel was shown to alter Ca2+ homeostasis in the cell and trigger inflammation processes. Here, we study transport properties of the E viroporin in mixed solutions of potassium and calcium chloride that contain a fixed total concentration (mole fraction experiments). The channel is reconstituted in planar membranes of different lipid compositions, including a lipid mixture that mimics the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) membrane where the virus localizes within the cell. We find that the E ion conductance changes non-monotonically with the total ionic concentration displaying an Anomalous Mole Fraction Effect (AMFE) only when charged lipids are present in the membrane. We also observe that E channel insertion in ERGIC-mimic membranes - including lipid with intrinsic negative curvature - enhances ion permeation at physiological concentrations of pure CaCl2 or KCl solutions, with a preferential transport of Ca2+ in mixed KCl-CaCl2 solutions. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that the presence of calcium modulates the transport properties of the E channel by interacting preferentially with charged lipids through different mechanisms including direct Coulombic interactions and possibly inducing changes in membrane morphology.


Asunto(s)
Calcio/metabolismo , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo/metabolismo , Proteínas Viroporinas/metabolismo , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Canales de Calcio/metabolismo , Transporte Iónico , Lípidos de la Membrana/metabolismo , Unión Proteica , Transporte de Proteínas , Soluciones , Proteínas Viroporinas/química
5.
Archivos españoles de urología ; 73(5):463-470, 2020.
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: covidwho-1016698

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: La pandemia provocada por el nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 ha tenido una elevada repercusión sobre la cirugía mínimamente invasiva (CMI). Ha surgido una importante controversia sobre la realización de CMI durante la pandemia COVID-19. Es prioritario, establecer un consenso sobre la organización y realización con seguridad de la CMI durante la pandemia. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda web y en PubMed con los términos: "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID19", "COVID19 Urology", "COVID19 Surgery", "COVID19 transmission", "SARS-CoV-2 transmission", "COVID19 and minimally invasive surgery", "SARSCoV-2 and CO2 insuflation". Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura y una síntesis de la evidencia disponible. Se ha utilizado una técnica de grupo nominal modificada, circulando un primer borrador a todos los autores y aprobándose la versión definitiva el día 26 de Mayo de 2020. RESULTADOS: No existe evidencia sobre una mayor exposición a SARS-CoV-2 en CMI respecto a cirugía abierta. La CMI se asocia a una menor estancia hospitalaria por lo que cambiar, sin justificación, la indicaciónde CMI puede retrotraer recursos que podrían ser utilizados para la pandemia COVID-19. Se debe priorizar la CMI según los recursos disponibles y la intensidad de la pandemia en cada momento. Se recomienda realizar despistaje de SARS-CoV-2 mediante cuestionario clínico-epidemiológico y PCR nasofaríngea 72 horas antes de la CMI electiva, para minimizar las complicaciones postoperatorias, evitar la transmisión cruzada entre pacientes y la posible exposición de los profesionales sanitarios. Se recomienda establecer medidas de organización en quirófano, de protección personal, técnica quirúrgica y manejo del CO2 y aerosoles generados para reducir la exposición y riesgos del personal sanitario. CONCLUSIONES: La CMI realizada con las medidasd e seguridad adecuadas para el paciente y profesionales, puede contribuir durante la desescalada a una menor utilización de recursos sanitarios y por tanto, no debe limitarse su utilización o cambiar sus indicaciones OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has high repercussion on urologic minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Controversy about safety of MIS procedures during COVID-19 pandemic has been published. Nowadays, our priority should be create agreement in order to restart and organize MIS with safety conditions for patients and healthcare workers. METHODS: Pubmed and web search was conducted with following terms: "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID19";"COVID19 Urology", COVID19 Surgery", "COVID19 transmission", "SARS-CoV-2 transmission", "COVID19 and minimally invasive surgery""SARS-CoV-2 and CO2 insuflation". A narrative review of available literature and scientific evidence summary was done. A modify nominal group technique was used to achieve an expert consensus. First draft was circulated amongst authors. Definitive document was approved in May 26th. RESULTS: Non evidence supports higher risk of SARSCoV-2 healthcare workers infection with MIS compared to open surgery. MIS is associated with shorter hospital stay than open surgery. Modify MIS indications to open surgery, with no scientific evidence, could spend valuable resources in detriment to COVID-19 patients. MIS indications should be prioritized attending to available resources and pandemic intensity. SARS-CoV-2 screening 72 hours prior to surgery by clinical and epidemiological questionnaire and nasopharyngeal PCR is recommended, in order to prevent nosocomial transmission, professional infections and to minimize postoperative complications. Intraoperative steps should be established to reduce professional exposure to surgical aerosols, including: surgical room reorganization, adequate personal protective equipment, surgical technique optimization and management of CO2 and surgical smoke

6.
Archivos espanoles de urologia ; 73(5):463-470, 2020.
Artículo | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-601044

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic hashigh repercussion on urologic minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Controversy about safety of MIS procedures during COVID-19 pandemic has been published. Nowadays, our priority should be create agreement in order to restart and organize MIS with safety conditions for patients and healthcare workers. METHODS: Pubmed and web search was conducted with following terms: "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID19", "COVID19 Urology", COVID19 Surgery", "COVID19 transmission", "SARS-CoV-2 transmission", "COVID19 nd minimally invasive surgery", "SARS-CoV-2 and CO 2insuflation". A narrative review of available literature and scientific evidence summary was done. A modify nominal group technique was used to achieve an expert consensus. First draft was circulated amongst authors. Definitive document was approved in May 26th. RESULTS: Non evidence supports higher risk of SARSCoV-2 healthcare workers infection with MIS compared to open surgery. MIS is associated with shorter hospital stay than open surgery. Modify MIS indications to open surgery, with no scientific evidence, could spend valuable resources in detriment to COVID-19 patients. MIS indications should be prioritized attending to available resources and pandemic intensity. SARS-CoV-2screening 72 hours prior to surgery by clinical and epidemiological questionnaire and nasopharyngeal PCRis recommended, in order to prevent nosocomial transmission, professional infections and to minimize postoperative complications. Intraoperative steps should be established to reduce professional exposure to surgical aerosols, including: surgical room reorganization, adequate personal protective equipment, surgical technique optimization and management of CO2 and surgical smoke. CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19 pandemic de-escalation, MIS carried out with optimal safety measurements, could contribute to reduce hospital resources utilization. With current evidence, MIS should not be limited or reconverted to open surgery during COVID-19 pandemic.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA